<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GW-M5600 G-Shock &#8212;  Good Things Come In Small Packages</title>
	<link>http://www.gmtplusnine.com/2008/03/22/gw-m5600-g-shock/</link>
	<description>Japanese Watch Enthusiasts</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: bryanandersen</title>
		<link>http://www.gmtplusnine.com/2008/03/22/gw-m5600-g-shock/#comment-2536</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 22:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gmtplusnine.com/2008/03/22/gw-m5600-g-shock/#comment-2536</guid>
					<description>Hi Alex,

Thanks for the kind words... Especially appreciate the clarification on the timer/stopwatch details as those might be important points for those interested in purchasing either of these models.

Regards,

Bryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alex,</p>
<p>Thanks for the kind words&#8230; Especially appreciate the clarification on the timer/stopwatch details as those might be important points for those interested in purchasing either of these models.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Bryan
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.gmtplusnine.com/2008/03/22/gw-m5600-g-shock/#comment-2112</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 06:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gmtplusnine.com/2008/03/22/gw-m5600-g-shock/#comment-2112</guid>
					<description>Great article Bryan, that picture of the GW-M5600's caseback alone makes me want to "upgrade" from a G-5600 to a GW-M5600

As for the comparison between the G-5600 and the GW-M5600, few things that were a bit off there; the timer on the G-5600 is a 100 hour timer (not 60 minute), and its stopwatch also goes to 100 hours (not 1000 hours). The 60 minute timer on the GW-M5600 is the only thing keeping me from purchasing one, as I frequently need more than a 1 hour timer. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Bryan, that picture of the GW-M5600&#8217;s caseback alone makes me want to &#8220;upgrade&#8221; from a G-5600 to a GW-M5600</p>
<p>As for the comparison between the G-5600 and the GW-M5600, few things that were a bit off there; the timer on the G-5600 is a 100 hour timer (not 60 minute), and its stopwatch also goes to 100 hours (not 1000 hours). The 60 minute timer on the GW-M5600 is the only thing keeping me from purchasing one, as I frequently need more than a 1 hour timer. <img src='http://www.gmtplusnine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: casiophile</title>
		<link>http://www.gmtplusnine.com/2008/03/22/gw-m5600-g-shock/#comment-2057</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gmtplusnine.com/2008/03/22/gw-m5600-g-shock/#comment-2057</guid>
					<description>Very interesting - especially the section you translated Bryan.  Now it makes sense why this hadn't been done before...

The dial is very reminiscent of a DW-5000C-1A and definitely gives the watch a retro look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting - especially the section you translated Bryan.  Now it makes sense why this hadn&#8217;t been done before&#8230;</p>
<p>The dial is very reminiscent of a DW-5000C-1A and definitely gives the watch a retro look.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ggyy1276</title>
		<link>http://www.gmtplusnine.com/2008/03/22/gw-m5600-g-shock/#comment-2052</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gmtplusnine.com/2008/03/22/gw-m5600-g-shock/#comment-2052</guid>
					<description>I beg to differ, petew. 
First of all, they are still making good profit by selling the current 25th L.E. Frogman.
And since they are one of the all time favorites among G-Shock collectors, I would imagine them putting
out new Wademan, Antman before updating the Frogman series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I beg to differ, petew.<br />
First of all, they are still making good profit by selling the current 25th L.E. Frogman.<br />
And since they are one of the all time favorites among G-Shock collectors, I would imagine them putting<br />
out new Wademan, Antman before updating the Frogman series.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: petew</title>
		<link>http://www.gmtplusnine.com/2008/03/22/gw-m5600-g-shock/#comment-2049</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gmtplusnine.com/2008/03/22/gw-m5600-g-shock/#comment-2049</guid>
					<description>I enjoyed the review Bryan.  I like this new trend towards better looking casbacks.  So often, on the older casebacks, the quality is inconsistent.  Sometimes the imprints on G's would be very weak.  That always bugged me.  Casio seems to be upping their game in this area and it's a welcome improvement in my eyes.

I know so many have been waiting for a long time for a multi-band 5600.  You're translation helps to explain why it took so long.  I guess next on the list for Multiband, could very well be the Frogman which to me is badly in need of a redesign/update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed the review Bryan.  I like this new trend towards better looking casbacks.  So often, on the older casebacks, the quality is inconsistent.  Sometimes the imprints on G&#8217;s would be very weak.  That always bugged me.  Casio seems to be upping their game in this area and it&#8217;s a welcome improvement in my eyes.</p>
<p>I know so many have been waiting for a long time for a multi-band 5600.  You&#8217;re translation helps to explain why it took so long.  I guess next on the list for Multiband, could very well be the Frogman which to me is badly in need of a redesign/update.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sjors</title>
		<link>http://www.gmtplusnine.com/2008/03/22/gw-m5600-g-shock/#comment-2046</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gmtplusnine.com/2008/03/22/gw-m5600-g-shock/#comment-2046</guid>
					<description>Hello Brian,

I am surprised to read the 5-band technology ws difficult to miniaturize, but it makes sense whay first only a 2 band GW-5600 was released. Probably the development of the small and flat GW-056 was the first step to miniaturisation. 

I like the clean lay out of the GW-M5600. The eye on the G-5600 is maybe a fun looking digit, but takes a lot of room from the display. I think there is no other G-Shock with so much information around the display, but I'm very happy with the features and look of this watch. 

Kind regards,

Sjors</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Brian,</p>
<p>I am surprised to read the 5-band technology ws difficult to miniaturize, but it makes sense whay first only a 2 band GW-5600 was released. Probably the development of the small and flat GW-056 was the first step to miniaturisation. </p>
<p>I like the clean lay out of the GW-M5600. The eye on the G-5600 is maybe a fun looking digit, but takes a lot of room from the display. I think there is no other G-Shock with so much information around the display, but I&#8217;m very happy with the features and look of this watch. </p>
<p>Kind regards,</p>
<p>Sjors
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
